Trially AI

AI-native clinical trial enrollment platform that matches, engages, and enrolls patients from health-system records.

Trially AI, founded in 2023 and headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, builds an AI-native clinical trial enrollment platform that matches, engages, and enrolls eligible patients by reading structured and unstructured health-system data. The company raised a $4.7M seed round led by Flyover Capital in 2025. Trially states on its own site that its product is HIPAA compliant and displays an AICPA SOC 2 attestation badge and an FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance badge; buyers should request the current SOC 2 report and Part 11 validation documentation to confirm scope.

Headquarters
Kansas City, United States
Founded
2023
Compliance
HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, 21 CFR Part 11
Deployment options
cloud
Website
https://www.trially.ai
LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/company/trially

Categories

AI Use Cases

  • Patient Recruitment & Enrollment
  • Site Selection & Performance

Vendor Scorecard

64% — Partial coverage. Coverage score — how completely Atlas documents Trially AI across 7 buyer-evaluation areas. Reflects available Atlas data, not solution quality.

Compliance & Validation — Documented

HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, 21 CFR Part 11

Deployment & Hosting — Documented

cloud

Pricing Transparency — Not documented by Atlas

Ask the vendor: What is your pricing model, and what drives total cost of ownership?

Implementation & Onboarding — Not documented by Atlas

Ask the vendor: What is a realistic implementation timeline, and what onboarding support is included?

Organization & Role Fit — Documented

Biotech Startup, Mid-Size Biotech, Large Pharma, CRO / CDMO, Clinical Operations, Data Management

Solution Scope — Documented

Natural Language Processing, Patient Recruitment

Company Viability — Partially documented

Seed, Founded 2023

Always ask the vendor

Not captured in Atlas data — confirm directly. Excluded from the score above.

Data Rights & IP

Who owns model outputs? Is our proprietary data used to train models others can access, and where does our data reside?

Model Credibility & Explainability

Can you share validation studies or benchmarks, explain how the model reaches its conclusions, and describe how bias and drift are monitored?

Questions to Ask This Vendor

  • How is patient-matching accuracy measured on our therapeutic area and site population?
  • Which EHR and health-system data sources can the platform ingest, and what does integration require?
  • Can you share the current SOC 2 Type II report and 21 CFR Part 11 validation package under NDA?
  • What site or sponsor deployments can serve as references for our indication?